Is Freedom of Speech going to return to Tribe.net?
Is the TOU going to be rewritten to return ownership of works posted on Tribe.net to those who created such work?
Is the TOU going to be rewritten to return ownership of works posted on Tribe.net to those who created such work?
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 11:22 AMDo you see this in section 5 of the TOU? -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 12:12 PMI think that's what the Sister is referring to, although technically it doesn't give ownership to Tribe, just the right for Tribe to freely republish or otherwise use any and all content posted to the site until such time as you delete it. So, you still own it, you just waive the right to keep Tribe from doing as they please with it while it's posted on the site.
The relevant passage:
5. Content
We do not claim ownership of the content you post or otherwise provide to the Service. However, you hereby grant, and agree to grant as an effect of posting or otherwise providing content, the following license: to the public, a license for personal non-commercial use; and to Tribe, a perpetual license to use, copy, distribute, display, perform, and modify any and all content that you post on the Service. This license cannot be withdrawn except that any content deleted from the Tribe site will terminate the Tribe license. Your use of the service is in consideration for this license, we will not otherwise pay you for your content. You represent and warrant that you have not granted and will not grant any rights inconsistent with this license.
Link: sanfrancisco.tribe.net/templa...erms.vm
I can see how many would find that rather chilling. Over at free-association.net your content is still yours. The only rights reserved by us is that of removing content that infringes on our own TOU ( free-association.net/index.php ). And you run the risk of having stuff removed by Association owners or mods.
The other aspect of Tribe's TOU that's most noisome to me personally is section 1(b) of the Code of Conduct...particularly this bit:
You agree not to "...post, publish, or transmit any text, graphics, or material that...contains, encourages, advocates, or expresses: obscenity, pornography, sexually explicit conduct".
Link: sanfrancisco.tribe.net/templa...Code.vm -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 12:18 PMWell, seeing as how they HAVE to reproduce it in order to show it, then they kinda need a license to do so. And that license can be revoked by removal of the content.
This seems sensible.
In groups designed to work out details of the TOU, there has been some discussion about specifying the PURPOSE of the license (which would be helpful), but section 5 is not a rights grab at all.
It used to be. It ain't anymore.
The Code of Conduct isues, well, that's a separate thing, yeah.
But at least one big issue, the Section 5 issue, has been approached, and fiddled a bit with, and is supposedly in line for more fiddling.
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 12:20 PMI don't think it's all that egregious. You still own the material, but they have the right to publish it as long as you keep it on their servers. A very basic legal CYA.
The big deficiency is that they don't limit themselves to publishing it only on tribe.net... so there is the loophole where they can publish it elsewhere. But -- your retaliation to this would be to take the material off their servers, thus taking away their right to republish.
I think the big issue is more with mature tribes, censorship, etc... -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 12:27 PM"I think the big issue is more with mature tribes, censorship, etc..."
There is always going to be a "biggest issue". 8)
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 12:42 PM> I think the big issue is more with mature tribes, censorship, etc...
Absolutely agreed.
To say nothing of the impending data retention crap headed the way of all US-based ISPs and Social Networks courtesy of our Torture Cza...er...Attorney General Gonzales.
Examples:
www.internetnews.com/bus-new.../3602961
news.com.com/Congress+ta...6071040.html
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Wed, October 11, 2006 - 4:17 PMI'm definitely glad to see the changes to the copyright issue. I agree that the new version is considerably more reasonable than the last one, but I would also prefer to see it preventing them from republishing the material elsewhere.
>> I think the big issue is more with mature tribes, censorship, etc... <<
Yup. I'm very disappointed to see the "and you agree NOT to:... post, publish, or transmit any text, graphics, or material... that contains, encourages, advocates, or expresses: obscenity, pornography, sexually explicit conduct... profanity, vulgarity or gratuitous violence or use of weapons" stuff still in there.
By these standards, a lot of prime time television shows would be violations on here. And many of those kinds of things are pretty subjective anyways.
Well, OK, so if it's subjective, then I will jolly well continue to interpret things the way that *I* see fit ;->
I suppose they almost *had* to put *something* of this nature in, along with the child porn and illegal drugs and weapons prohibitions, (which I am actually entirely in favor of). What remains to be seen is how they interpret these things, and what actions they take, if any.
Does anyone know offhand if flagging still exists, or did the new team deep-six that along with the new interface?
Wendy
Wendy
-
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 2:22 PMSonya, I hope that you will one day stop smugly plugging Free Association every time you got a chance to bag on Tribe, after all, you're still using it, right?
Please, just consider the fact that some of us are really proud of what we've made, working to make it better, and might consider it to be rude. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 2:41 PMKudos Jenni...I like your style
.....fix everything already now yesterday!
:P
~MTS~
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 3:00 PMWho's bagging on tribe? I've posted that I loved the old tribe, think the new stuff is a distinct improvement over 1/06 and 4/06, and that I just still have some issues with the TOU and Code of Conduct as currently written.
And of course I still use it! There are still people and tribes I like here. I just figure as long as improvements are being made, it would be good if they're more than just technological. There was a reason Tribe was my online home starting in late '03 and why I was so upset when the TOU changes came down the pike in December. This place was great, and I honestly think that, between ongoing improvements in the features and UI of this place AND relaxing the TOU and CoC, it could be again.
You'll notice I'm not saying, "drop Tribe for FA!", "Tribe sucks", or that FA-related content is even the bulk of what I've been posting today. But comparing and contrasting is a useful tool to make the arguments I'm trying to make in favor of Tribe becoming as open again, content-wise, as it once was. And if people check FA out in the process, who loses? To paraphrase Steve Jobs back in '98, "Tribe doesn't have to lose for FA to win." There's plenty of room for both of us. :-)
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 4:07 PMI'm not an employee so I can say clearly that I think it is rude. It is rude to the employees who are working hard and it is rude to the people who have choosen to stay at tribe, always implying that by doing so we are doing something wrong or stupid. Was it cool to know about free ass? of course. I have a profile there even. But enough is enough, the people who wanted to go have gone. Let it go...or buy some ad space on tribe. But while you bag on tribe at every turn you turn some of us off of free ass because while I might have enjoyed it there (although I never considered leaving tribe, I might have spent time there also) I refuse to give in to gorilla advertising. I don't like it when people knock on my home door or ring my home phone to try to sell me something and I don't like it when they repetedly, loudly, rudely and without any respect for the desires of the other people in the tribe(as a moderator I have gotten more complaints about the free ass spam than anything tribe has done btw) come to my online home. I have a rule about not buying things from companies who attack me with ads, be they door to door salesman, phone soliciting or obnoxious pop up ads. I am adding free ass to that list. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 4:34 PMI'm sorry you see it that way.
Let me stress again, that I'm not trying to get anyone to "leave tribe" at this point and that I'm actually quite excited and pleased about the new changes. I've posted more today on Tribe than I have in the last month as a result of them! And actually, the majority of my posts today haven't even linked to FA or anything like that. I've offered up or replied to suggestions in TribeIdeas and Tribe Brainstorm, talked Mac browser issues with the new setup in the hopes of helping users with thing in Mac OS X, and so forth.
I'm also by no means stating or implying that people staying on Tribe are stupid, especially with the ousting of the Gullette regime. I just still have some issues with the Tou and Code of Conduct changes leftover from said regime, and am discussing them in what would seem to be the appropriate tribes and threads to do so. I'm not wandering randomly spamming, I haven't started any of these threads, and I'm not "bagging on Tribe". If anything, I've always been very careful to separate issues with policy out from the site itself.
And, for the record, when others have come from FA and started indiscriminately spamming or slagging Tribe, I've done what I can over there to get them to stop precisely because I don't endorse that kind of behavior. I know it turns people off. So, don't lump me in with others just because they came over from a site I helped start and help run. I'm not the boss of them. If I were, I would have fired them or docked their pay for that.
But are ongoing concerns about what people are agreeing to when they "click through", TOU/Code-based limitations on the kind of content one can have in one's own Tribes, or worries about what impending legislation means for places like this invalid ones? Is it the fact that I have the logo as my avatar that bugs you and Jenni? What? I'm speaking civilly here and the vast bulk of what I'm saying has nothing to do with "come to FA!". It is, however, about a hope I've had since the end of last year that I could really start feeling more at home here for myself *as a Tribe user* again. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 5:10 PMI do agree your tone is reasonable in this thread. And if it was one post, or if it was about constructive stuff about tribe then great. But it isn't about tribe, it almost always (and I just got done looking through posts in tribeideas) about free ass vs tribe. which might on it's own still be fine if we had not been being attacked by the spam for months already. I admit the people who were doing it in the tribes I was in were people I liked and I can't speak to your past posts as I can't remember any of them specifically since you guys have the same avatar and I have not been active in the tribe tribes that are the only ones I share with you.
I don't have any problem with your avatar.
Maybe if you could think of it like if someone just keeps ragging on you about something until you just do not want to hear about it anymore. Then someone else comes by and keeps talking about it. Maybe they do it more resonably...but by now it grates on your nerves and it's not just in one place it's in a bunch of posts...in several tribes. Talk about whatever you want...but if you come to my home and talk about how much better your home is...that's rude. Saying hey have you thought about adding a plant here? is one thing. Saying "at MY house, we would never be without a plant there...I'm not sure how you can even live here" is rude. Or maybe it gets shortened to "oh...at *my* house we have a plant, why don't *you* have a plant?" But ya know what? I have a black thumb and plants are right for everyone and I'm sick of hearing about it.
Again I'm not saying don't respectfully address issues about tribe stuff. But man don't come to my housewarming party and diss my house.
Or maybe you have a friend whose always trying to sell you something? You like them, their discussion is interesting...but somehow they always throw in how you could really use some of their product? and you just want them to stop! -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 5:48 PMThat's all fair enough...and I do beg a little forebearance, since over the last 8 mo. or so FA is the example of another site with alternate functionality with which I'm most familiar. If I'd been spending all my time on MySpace (*shudder*), I would probably be using that as a basis for comparison, or ditto some PHP-Nuke site or something.
But if you look in TribeIdeas, the stuff I'm talking about there, like with HTML (or BBCode) in posts, ignore features, posted URL handling, link text, stuff like that, isn't just an FA thing. Forums and boards all over the net have features like that and don't turn into cesspools of bad use (like people using 100 fonts on a single flier back in the early days of Desktop Publishing...oy), despite Edward's (pleasantly respectful) disagreement and I only bring them up because I do think they're constructive for Tribe! It's not "neener neener, we have this and Tribe doesn't", but rather, "I've seen some ways of doing things differently and I think Tribe could benefit".
Sure, I'd love to have more "dual citizens", but that's not why I started posting here today...it was because this is momentous stuff, I'm still a Tribe user (in which respect it's my house, too! Not as much as it is Jenni's, tho, of course...), I see really good things happening, but there are still unresolved issues that need discussing, especially on a thread called "Freedom of Speech". I just have a good knowledge of and passion for the subject thanks to the old arguments back in December/January (and from having had to prep a presentation I made in May on FA's founding so that I didn't come off looking like a goober who didn't know what she was talking about...I pretty much had to know Tribe's TOU and Code of Conduct cold if I was going to answer any detailed questions).
I'm dead serious when I say I'd love Tribe to be a place I'd like to spend more time taking about...ya know...stuff! To me, changing the TOU and CoC back to something more in line with the pre-12/05 Tribe is a part of that for me. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 6:52 PMI can see all of that. Maybe you can see also that after the way some people behaved to tribe and about FA that it sets up a pre-existing irratation.
I can't speak for anyone else but I think now would be an excellent time for a new start. For all of us I'd love to see no more bagging on tribe for old stuff and a clean slate for FA enthusiasts to show how much they want to be involved in tribe...and for some of the rest of us to stop wanting to smack someone's head against a brick wall every time they see any reference to FA. What do you think? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 8:22 PMI'm absolutely game, and FWIW I really did try to give some of the more obnoxiously zealous a verbal smack for doing more harm than good. Many were the times I was looking at what some theoretically well-meaning individual was posting and giving a hearty "D'OH!" followed by a, "NOT helping here, people!"
We were looking to attract well-adjusted (if annoyed at the time) perverts and alt-types and unfortunately also got a number of verbal bare-knuckle brawlers who just like to start shit, kind of like how it went down when LiveJournal spawned DeadJournal, you know? Only with better intentions. :-P ("With friends like these," and all that...) *sighs*
But I do think the CoC stuff in particular is an ongoing concern for all Tribe users since that hasn't changed yet. At least for those Tribe users worried about protecting more explicit text and images, and ensuring that there be "adult-friendly" parts of the site not requiring a network of "pointer tribes" and invitations to find, anyway. There has got to be a better compromise that satisfies both the rights of of the "adult"-content-oriented to be able to readily find such content and the sensibilities of those wishing to avoid it. You yourself were expressing similar feelings on another thread, if memory serves. I don't think that constitutes "bagging" so much as "constructive criticism." -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 8:46 PMyes, I know that feeling. I had the same feelings (probably about the same people) when they posted the stuff in my tribes and I got all of the complaints.
I do have concerns about the cencorship and actually had my run in with TOU guy(s) before the big freak out of everyone else, back when Mark was in charge before in fact. So I am not putting on rose colored glasses and thinking all is going to be easy and exactly how I think it should be. But I do think we should take this sign of good faith and good direction they have given us and give them a bit of time to get going on things like customer service(have you been around to all of the people yelling about none of their e-mails to help@tribe going unanswered?) and for them to settle in and figure out where they are going and how they are going to get there. Because I just don't think they will know what they can/need/want to do about the porn(and I use the term lovingly...why didn't I join naked punk boys when I had the chance?!?) and edgier things that are now underground.
But I realize you did not start this thread today, you only responded to it because you feel passionate about it. I just hope people can just take a deep breath...enjoy the amazing gift they just gave us...and I mean shockingly amazing considering the amount of work the tribe employees put in to get this done with what has to be serious serious short staff and short time frame... and give them a bit of time to take a little nap or something, then we can get back on them about the other important stuff.
We should all bring them some hot chocolate and soft pillows and be really really quiet for a teeny bit so they can rest. -
-
Re: the morality of reading or posting to Tribe
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 8:45 AM
If memory serves, Tribe has made it way beyond abundantly clear that they don't want BDSM-related content on their site. As a BDSM person, I find this just as _morally_reprehensible_ as their saying that they don't want content from gays, lesbians, and people of other sexual orientations. I could even argue for generalizing this to other issues such as religions and races.
This being the case, I really have to raise the issue of how is either reading or posting to Tribe a morally clean act for a BDSM person? _Especially_ when a genuinely welcoming alternative such as -- God bless 'em -- www.free-association.net exists.
Frankly, this place makes me sick. The _only_ reason I ever post here anymore is either 1) because the stakes are huge (such as my recent participation in the breath control thread in the SF Citadel tribe -- a tribe which itself is a TOU violation by simply existing) or 2) to confront Tribe management on its hateful hypocrisy.
Remember people, the billion-times-repeated mantra of profitability for a place like this is "eyeballs to advertisers."
I just don't get how it's a morally clean act for a BDSM person to intentionally contribute to the profitability of a for-profit corporation that had made it clear that they don't want us here by either reading or, especially, posting (translation: providing content for free to a for-profit corporation) here _unless_ there is some compelling reason to otherwise justify it. After all, it's hard for Tribe's sales staff to sell advertising to companies such as Starbucks and Banana Republic with those pesky BDSM people spoiling their "slightly naughty but very hip" corporate image.
Before the change in policy, we were genuinely welcome here and this place was a delight. After the change in policy, this place became basically a drag. It got to the point where a genuinely welcoming alternative was created -- Free Ass.
What we gots now is a change in managment. That is _completely_ irrelevant. A change in _policy_, OTOH, would be a very relevant thing.
So far, at least, what we seem to have is:
"Meet the new boss; same as the old boss."
Very sincerely,
Jay Wiseman, JD
p.s. you might want to make a copy of this post. It may not be up for long.
-
-
Re: the morality of reading or posting to Tribe
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 6:32 PM"If memory serves, Tribe has made it way beyond abundantly clear that they don't want BDSM-related content on their site. As a BDSM person, I find this just as _morally_reprehensible_ as their saying that they don't want content from gays, lesbians, and people of other sexual orientations. I could even argue for generalizing this to other issues such as religions and races."
Well, if you want to battle with your memory, great, then do so. But that seems like an awfully private sort of thing to do. Just wait and see what happens, watch and check out the landscape. The absolute worse thing that can happen is what you're already fantasizing about, so, frankly, you lose nothing by just sitting and waiting and watching and seeing what happens.
I mean, it's not as if you are actually sacrificing nose skin, y'know?
"Frankly, this place makes me sick."
Then you might be happier somewhere else. I mean, it makes me sick to ride freighters out of the low-rent docks in Ventura... so I don't anymore. It's that simple.
Those of us who stay, or want to stay and help make it a place that we like will somehow cling to life.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Wed, October 11, 2006 - 4:48 PM>> I'm also by no means stating or implying that people staying on Tribe are stupid, <<
Well, you might not *mean* it that way, Sonya, but it *is* how it reads to others, unfortunately.
And there *are* others who are also, in fact, being quite explicit about how they think that anyone who stays on and posts to Tribe is out and out immoral - and not "cool".
It just gets really old to always have another service promoted every single cotton pickin' time anything comes up that you do differently than is done here. You may not be saying the specific words "Leave Tribe and come over to FA instead because we're better in every way", but that intent *is* clearly behind what you do say.
Years ago, when I first started sysopping on Compuserve, there was an actual rule prohibiting promoting competing services, or even really discussing them at all. It just simply Wasn't Done. I'm glad it's no longer a hard and fast rule, and I would *not* like to see such a rule instituted here or anywhere else, but I do think it should be as self-evident that one ought not to use one service as a platform for promoting another.
I mean, you wouldn't go into a local restaurant and start going around to all the tables or making an announcement about how good the competition across town is. You wouldn't go to a friend's house and complain about the food or the service or anything else you didn't like about how they entertained you, etc.
Discreet mentions - sure. Bringing it up in the context of a situation where you offer something that is not available on Tribe, yes. Putting a short line about it in your sig line (if we had sig lines here), why not. I'm guilty of things like that myself upon occasion, and occasionally a little bit *too* often. But the endless "We do it better on FA" responses to virtually *everything* you don't like about Tribe has, in fact, gotten way old.
We *know* about FA. Those who perceive value there are already over there and not here. The rest of us just ain't interested, for whatever our reasons are, and the repeated promotions are just turning a lot of us entirely off.
I totally agree with you about the problems and limitations of the TOU and so on here. I, too, am deeply worrried about increasing and further proposed legislation that is intended to curtail our freedom of speech, and indeed, all of our freedoms. But the place to fight those battles is in the courts and at the ballot box, and through grassroots efforts to gather support for our positions, in blogs, the media, public places, etc. - not by pitting one company or organization against another, especially when the reality of how these regulations have been enforced here is that by and large, they have *not* been.
Yes, there have been instances to the contrary, but for the most part, we are still functionally operating here much the same as we were a year ago before the new TOU went into effect, and no one has tried to stop the vast majority of the kind of content we are concerned about censorship with.
The simple fact of that matter is that FA, too, is subject to the very same laws and regulations, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not. At some point, the Injustice Department may very well catch up with you, too.
And you don't create change in an organization, if that is your intent, by leaving it and starting something to compete with it. You create it by working from within. Leaving sites like Tribe because they are attempting to comply with the law, however misguided the law may be, just plays right into the hands of those who would shut us down. It means that the bad guys have won.
Wendy -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Wed, October 11, 2006 - 9:12 PMTo learn more of Free Speech at Free Ass, here's a thread to show why most all of us have fled.
Oh, the horror...
free-association.net/index.php
-
-
-
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sun, October 8, 2006 - 4:37 AMWell, Jenni, some of us agree with Sonya. This place has been quite smelly since the ugly changes quite awhile back (not sure how long you've been around but it used to rock with the best content and discussions around).
Part of 'making it better' needs to be pointing out the crap as well as pointing out what's good (wherever it may exist). I'm still waiting for it to be made better, improved graphics aside.
-
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 3:56 PMI freely admit that I hadn't reread the TOU before posting the initial comment of this thread. That is an important rewrite of the TOU from when I left tribe in protest, deleting all my tribes and removing, in totality, my threads and content. (that was as CV Rick). In that version, despite the dependent opening clause of "We do not claim ownership . . . ", the subsequent paragraph did very much claim ownership. I even had a copyright attorney (friend of mine) look at it and his advice was to never post anything that I'd ever want to publish in any form anywhere else. He said that a strong prepublication and waiving of first publication and North American publication case could be made.
So, thank you for discussing that part of the TOU.
It has promise. I might return if more tolerance to the populace is given. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 7:53 PM<<that was as CV Rick>>
You had a sex change!
Cool.
(nice to see you, CV) -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Fri, September 22, 2006 - 11:31 PMThanks, Geo.
I may rejoin completely (this just gives me a periodic lurker/troublemaker persona) if things really do improve.
This is probably a common story, but I'll tell it anyway. I spent so much time on my tribe profile, my blog, my tribes, etc. that when all the changes came, I took it very personally. In metaphor, they took my backyard and built a McDonald's, my front yard was home to a Baptist revival tent, and my street was now a strip mall. It forced me to move.
I'm not buying back into the neighborhood without some assurances, and I know I'm just one small profile with little economic clout, so I don't expect a parade or a key from the mayor, but I'm cautious just the same. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 5:58 PMThere's been a few old timers showing back up in the last couple days and it's awesome.
Speaking of... Hi Rick. :)
I think it's time right now to enjoy the new changes and see where this goes without a whole bunch of bitching. Why take the goddamn fun out of every last freaking thing. why? why? why?
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 6:25 PM"I'm not buying back into the neighborhood without some assurances"
I think reassurance isn't ever really in the cards ANYWHERE.
New owners and possibly a new approach. Watch and see how it feels. If it feels like a place to be, then be there. If not, make suggestions and try to change it or leave.
But who worth a damn can make reassurances about the future? It might be different, or it might not.
Or, to stick with your metaphor, DON'T buy, just rent for a while.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 6:36 PMI got yer back, Jenni. But Tribe folks should stop gloating over poor Jan. You may be trying to flag his cab in a few weeks, if you know what I mean. Beyond that, you may be in the same food stamp line if your "new old" schtick fails. Poor winners are worse than sore losers. Modeling the behaviour you desire to see in others is always a good strategy.
As for Sonya, if she spent half the time in Free Association making a better site as she does here making the same tired points over and over again, perhaps Free Ass would be able to attract users on its own merits rather than on the bones of bitter pie.
Furthermore, I suggest billing Free Association at straight rate card for every plug they make for their services in the future. Effective immediately.
-
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sun, September 24, 2006 - 12:50 PMFree association has it's own "Free Speech" issues of late, and many who went over are now back here on tribe.
Including me.
-
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sun, October 1, 2006 - 4:34 PM~{As for Sonya, if she spent half the time in Free Association making a better site as she does here making the same tired points over and over again, perhaps Free Ass would be able to attract users on its own merits rather than on the bones of bitter pie.}~
*standing ovation* -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Freedom of Speech
Sun, October 1, 2006 - 5:49 PMThe deletions of threads, Associations, and members at Free Association is at least as bad as it was during tribes TOU disaster and melt-down earlier this year.
I've enjoyed posting back on tribe,as it is well to see so many old friends back here. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Mon, October 2, 2006 - 11:27 PM> The deletions of threads, Associations, and members at Free Association is at least as bad
> as it was during tribes TOU disaster and melt-down earlier this year.
Well, there's a bunch of unsubstantiated FUD.
To date, precisely 2 people have been booted from FA (and those on TOU grounds, which is quite the achievement on our site), no associations closed without the permission of their owners, and the only threads deleted have been by association owners or moderators for being inappropriate to the rules *of that association*, just like moderators here on tribe are free to do at any time as they see fit. There have also been a few individual posts removed for revealing privileged information regarding unconsenting 3rd parties...and I'm sure no one here would want their dirty laundry aired in public while they weren't in a position to even be online to tell their own story. We do value privacy as well as free speech and expression, you see.
All it comes down to is that a small group feels un-catered-to and that someone they like was "done wrong" when the fact is quite the reverse, so they cast it in the light of some kind of official persecution and tell everyone what ogres we are.
But personally...between me and you, Vaughn, you just wait 'til he lies to you like he lied to me and the rest of the SC, and continues to try to lie. He's venomous, and you, Fairy, Dave & Jean, and averyone else would do well to listen. PM me here on on FA if you're really willing to hear, and I'll be happy to fill you in since that's where anything further belongs. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Tue, October 3, 2006 - 6:25 AMThis has been what it was like being at Free Association. Dealing with an oligarchy telling one what to post. Sonya sent me a complaint that someone was upset that I had posted the word "roid" in a post about silly foods. The post was "how about some deep fried 'roids with a piece of whitebread to sop up the gravey with" I got a reprimand from Sonya because someone took offense to me posting the word "roid" in a post'
So I was flamed, when I responded to being called out, I was threatened with expulsion from Associations by Steering Committee members. It is no fun posting at a site where a favored elite are allowed to call you out in posts, but if you respond you get threatened with censorship.
But in truth, few people post there anymore, I do hope for the best, and as tribe seems now the better after some hard changes, so I hope for Free Association. And Sonya has her own Free Association tribe where she should keep her filthy laundry at.
How funny that Free Association keeps at least two tribes here. -
-
Re: Freedom of Speech
Tue, October 3, 2006 - 10:26 AMUm...no...
You were volunteering to help run FA as a member of the SC, "roid" had become a very charged word to use since one user had coined it to bash another group who'd started to annoy him, and I *PMed* you to suggest that that might not be the most "leaderly" thing to do to be tossing that around if you were going to be on the SC (to actually try to help you get on it, I might add, since we have to be everyone's SC and not just one group or another's). Had you not been aiming to be one of the people in charge of the place, no one would have said "boo" to you.
Then, you were the one who took it public, rather than being "called out" as you claim, and proceeded to start "raging against the machine", making it perfectly clear to everyone that you wouldn't be able to live up to the Standards of Conduct that apply only to SC members and site admins, and NOT to other members.
At least tell the story as it actually happened, complete with the sour grapes.
(Also, for the record, it's not me "maintaining" the free-association.net EmbASSy tribe, but rather other FA users reclaiming a tribe started as a slur on FA and making proverbial lemonade. At this point, I just leave "Tribe Alternatives" up for historical interest, since it shows the why and how of FA's "birth". I was actually going to mail tribe to delete it when it came under troll-attack from an alt of one of our 2 booted people, but was talked out of it...it's all in the threads.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-